-
Call Us Now 9560744478
-
Mail Us Now advocatepriyapaul@gmail.com
The judiciary in India is important to carry out the Constitution, mete out justice, and uphold the rule of law. Being a democratic country, India follows a structured and defined judiciary. Article on the Indian Judiciary- Structure of Indian Judiciary, Levels of the Indian Judiciary, Functions of the Indian Judiciary, Importance of Independence. In understanding the judiciary, hence appreciating its role in a democratic setup, it must be understood that significant reasons for this are so that no single branch of government takes over the other branches.
Indian judiciary has two main features. There is the Supreme Court the High Courts and subordinate courts. Each of the three constitutes and implements several functions and roles. The hierarchical structure brings out a system of clear-cut command, and cases can go through the judiciary at various tiers for further review. The structured approach, therefore, ensures that judicial decisions are uniform and offers a system of appeal and review to ensure justice. It also provides an avenue for specialization and expertise at different tiers to solve different problems in different areas of law with effectiveness.
The Apex Court of India is the highest authority in the judicial hierarchy. The Apex Court is the highest authority on constitutional interpretations and a self-proclaimed protector of the Constitution. The court was established in 1950, and the main headquarters is located in New Delhi. It speaks last on all issues, meaning that it is the court of last resort and affords uniformity as well as consistency in the application of law from state to state. The Supreme Court also enhances protection for the citizens' fundamental rights since it gets a chance to see, evaluate, and scrap laws or activities that violate constitutional provisions.
The judiciary authority is termed the Supreme Court of India as the supreme court of the land. The court consists of the Chief Justice of India, besides up to 34 judges. A Chief Justice, like any other judge, has to be appointed by the President of India after the Collegium has forwarded proposals that include the Chief Justice and four senior-most judges. It is also designed in a manner that the court's discretion would be managed through the diminution of the influence of the executive power in the judicial appointments. It only means that it is at the highest court where the most qualified and experienced judges of the country are, maintaining the integrity and competence of the judiciary in this rigorous selection process.
Jurisdictions of Supreme Courts Original, Appellate, and Advisory Jurisdiction The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court includes cases of constitutional importance, and appeals from the courts, and is also authorized to give advisory opinions based on issues the President asks about legal issues. Original Jurisdiction: The original jurisdiction involves cases involving the Union and states. Appellate jurisdiction, however, makes it possible for it to hear appeals from the lower courts in matters that regard civil, criminal and constitutional significance. Advisory Jurisdiction: The court has allowed the President to seek an opinion on a question that is too complex, through advisory jurisdiction so that he may frame an informed and law-sound governance.
The most significant judgments the Supreme Court delivered during its term is that it laid down the foundation of the basic structure doctrine and the decriminalization of Section 377, Indian Penal Code, Kesavananda Bharati. Therefore, such judgments have always resulted in shaking the very bottom of Indian society and governance. Most of the time, it has indeed been the case with landmark judgments, which provide important answers to issues of national importance. Such judgments become legal precedents that go on to determine later interpretations of the law as well as strengthen what role the Court plays in holding democracy and human rights together.
Indian High Courts are the judiciary at the state or union territory level. There are 25 High Courts within the Indian Federation and each of them has jurisdiction over one or more states or union territories. The Courts do the following; the High Courts are the primary civil Courts of original jurisdiction with all other judicial powers granted in the Constitution for such courts while exercising Appellate jurisdiction over their respective subordinate Courts. High Courts ensure justice delivery at state levels regarding adequate legal issues that affect citizens directly. They also oversee the administration of justice within their respective states upholding judicial discipline and integrity.
Every high court will consist of a chief justice and some other judges. The President would appoint the judges after consulting the Governors of each state and the Chief Justice of India as a measure of precaution toward achieving a balanced, independent judicature. The selection of judges of the high courts would be solely based on their legal acumen and experience. Therefore, they would always be well-armed enough to deal with complex legal issues and help in the development of state law.
The high courts are equipped with original and appellate jurisdictions. They deal with criminal and civil cases and are subject to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights. Original jurisdictions include:
It allows them to carry the appeal from other courts as well so that justice can be done after thorough analysis and re-interpretation through courts' lawyers. Equally, this court is important for the protection of the rights of citizens through giving out the writ of mandamus, habeas corpus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari.
Other important high courts of the country are the Bombay High Court and the Calcutta High Court. These courts are some of the oldest in the country, and these courts have a history and shaped Indian jurisprudence immensely. They have handled many landmark cases and worked to interpret and uphold the Constitution. For so long, legacies and experience held such courts at the helm and centre of India's judicial system and a benchmark in the delivery of judicial excellence and integrity.
The district courts operate at the district level and deal with most of the litigation being transacted in India. They deal with civil and criminal matters, which constitutes the first level of judicial intervention in most of the legal disputes. More importantly, district courts have an important role to play in providing equal justice to the general population and in resolving disputes that affect people directly on the subjects of the law. They provide the underlying structure to the judicial system, handle a tremendous volume of work, and mete out grassroots justice effectively and efficiently.
Every district has a district judge, whom the governor appoints, in consultation with the High Court of the state to which that district belongs. In addition, the District Judge has other judges and magistrates working under his supervision. The procedure for selecting these judges is so designed that only those eligible and who possess experience can be selected for the post. The position of the district judges is of great significance to the judiciary as they undertake the role of managing the administration of justice in their jurisdiction while seeing that legal procedure goes forward impartially and equitably.
District courts have original jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters. They also act as appellate courts for judgments made by inferior courts, which in this case are those that exist within a district. Under civil jurisdiction, they handle affairs concerning properties and contracts, family, and other civil matters. For criminal actions, they handle murder, theft, and assault, among others. Appellate courts are there to review verdicts passed by subordinated courts to deliver justice through examination of the grounds of judgments and arguments.
Some of the types of subordinate courts include civil, criminal, family, and consumer courts. Each deals with a different type of case. Civil courts usually deal with non-criminal disputes, for instance, those regarding property and contractual matters. Criminal courts deal with offences against the state or individuals, and their objective is to ensure that the persons committing them are brought to book. Family courts usually address marriage, divorce, and custody cases of children, focusing on an amicable settlement of all disputes. Consumer courts protect the rights of consumers in grievances against unfair trade practices or defective goods or services offered.
There also exist several specialized courts and tribunals in India, dealing with taxation, labour disputes and all such other related administrative legal matters. Technical expertise and speedy settling of disputes on varied particular legal subjects are the purposes served by these bodies. They relieve the workload of the normal courts and ensure complex legal issues are dealt with by experts in the field by focusing on specific cases.
Specialized courts and tribunals make a positive contribution to the efficiency and effectiveness of the judiciary by providing focused and timely justice. Examples of Specialized Courts Some notable ones are the National Green Tribunal, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and Armed Forces Tribunal. National Green Tribunal is engaged with cases related to issues related to the environment, ensuring that the principles of environmental law are maintained; The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is the specialist forum for dealing with disputes regarding income tax and its efficient resolution with a fair judgment. Armed Forces Tribunal Lawyer deals specifically with armed forces conflicts revealing support for empowerment through it for military personnel to seek justice. These tribunals bolster the judicial system in its ability to handle a variety of legal affairs comprehensively.
The Indian Constitution enforces the independence of the judiciary through several provisions, namely, security of tenure, conditions of service, and distance between the executive. Security of tenure means no judge can be removed by an adverse vote of the appointing authority. Their salary and conditions of service cannot be altered to their detriment. This independence allows judges to make decisions independent of influence or pressure from others. Further, the separation of powers between the judiciary and other state organs prevents interference by other branches of government in judicial affairs that enhance judicial independence.
Judicial independence ensures the rule of law, protection of fundamental rights, and fair dispensation of justice. The judicial arm prevents powers from being abused and ensures laws and policies meet the constitutional requirements because this arm, comprising the judicial, acts as a good check on the powers of the legislative and the executive arms. Judicial independence increases public confidence in the judiciary as the citizens feel that their cases will be heard fairly and uninfluenced. It also emphasizes accountability, since judges can review the activities of a government and enforce accountability on the government for violations of law or rights.
The pendency of cases is the major problem. Justice delayed is justice denied. Judicial reforms, along with the increased usage of technology, are helping improve this area. Thus, the long backlogs put a heavy burden on the judiciary with much inefficiency and ineffectiveness. Some of the measures introduced include fast-track courts, the introduction of e-filing systems, and alternate dispute resolution mechanisms to avoid holdups and ensure speedy delivery of justice. That is what matters to maintain the independence and promptness of the judiciary system in delivering justice.
Judicial corruption has been one of the factors that have undermined the credibility of the judiciary. It is, therefore very important to address the issue by more stringent disciplinary action and transparent appointment procedures. Judicial corruption still, however, erodes people's faith in the judicial system as well as reduces the quality of justice dispensed. Strong accountability and transparency mechanisms over judicial conduct and appointments are likely to ensure overcoming the challenge. Constant scrutinizing, ethics training, and guaranteeing that the culture of truth and impartiality among the judges and the court officials continues would be mandatory to raise integrity in the judiciary.
Equality before the law and access to justice for all citizens generally, as well as particularly for the marginalized and deprived ones, forms the other significant challenge. Access to justice would be possible by ensuring legal aid services and raising awareness programs. Above all, several bars stood against justice such as high legal costs, ignorance, and geographical barriers. Free legal aid initiatives that created more courts in other ways remote places and then conducted legal literacy campaigns across these scattered regions motivated many justice cases. Facilitating access to justice gives the citizenry equal opportunity to enforce their rights in court and redress grievances for social justice and equality.
E-courts and digital filing systems have transformed the judiciary into one that offers efficient and accessible services. Digitization has been aimed at making the judicial procedures as modern as possible while employing the latest technology to make the court procedures simpler and free from paperwork. For example, e-courts allow the conduct of cases over the Internet and some of the cases are conducted with virtual prospects while submitting most of the documents in electronic form, thereby making judicial processes transparent and accessible. Such changes do not help the lay litigant but an attorney and a judge who are also the parties to any case within the Court. Thus, it builds the efficacy of the judicial system without court delays.
It needs to be transformed in such a manner that it is well-ready with processes like the National Judicial Appointments Commission. In this process, it results in a push towards openness and accountability. The appointment procedures are carried out in a very transparent manner, and thereby, only the best of the best make it as judges in such a way that integrity and confidence in the judiciary blossom. It is the involvement of multiple stakeholders during the appointment process, comprising the executive, judiciary, and civil society, balancing the selection of judges in an acceptable merit-based way. The same thing uses the appointment of judges to raise concerns about nepotism and favouritism; therefore it becomes fair and impartial.
The Indian judiciary is said to be the backbone of democracy which is, at the same time, a symbol of justice, highly ordered, and performs some specific functions. As it undergoes repeated reforms in the system, it has the strength to sail through tough times with perseverance and dedication toward the cause of independence and transparency within the institution. Thus, knowledge of the structure of this very important institution of governance that serves to uphold the rule of law and safeguard the rights of citizens is something very important in this regard. Only the commitment of the Indian judiciary towards justice, fairness, and integrity can help sustain democratic values while building public confidence in the legal system. Continuous efforts toward the accomplishment of reforms and overcoming hurdles will further galvanize the judiciary to ensure long-lasting roles as the important underpinning of both democracy and justice in India.
We are always available to guide the one in need with the right legal advice and build their confidence in the law.
Priya Paul & Associates are looking forward to directing the way with lawful guidance. Reach us to find the best one with legal experts.
Main Office Gurugram, Haryana, 122002
E-mail advocatepriyapaul@gmail.com
Phone 9560744478
WORKING HOURSMon-Sun: 8am – 5pm
We are the legal consultants who don't extend the court dates but cut the chase of appointments short by getting outcomes with lawful foundations.
